Everybody knows prime numbers. Most of us like prime numbers. Many of us love prime numbers. Some of us have noticed some curious things about prime number. Let me mention some of them:

*2* – the curious thing about the prime number 2 is obvious – it is the smallest prime

*3* – the smallest odd prime

*11* – the smallest 2-digital prime

*16* – the smallest number that is the fourth degree of some prime

Etc..

So, if we keep our mind busy thinking about curiosity of small integers, we will certainly be able to think of something interesting (related to primes) about every positive integer. But how far can we go? OK, we can think curious things about integers smaller than 10 – I’ll assume everyone can do that. Well, maybe we can assign a curio to every integer smaller than 100 as well. I guess, not everyone could do it so well this time, but, in fact, it could be possible for some of us. But what’s next? Can we go further till 1000? Can somebody tell me, for example, what is the curiosity about the integer 857 (it must be related to prime numbers)? Not instantly, I guess.. Therefore I was amazed by the theorem I found in this site:

**Theorem.** Every positive integer *n* has an associated prime curio.

And do you know what? There exists a proof for this theorem as well:

**Proof:** Let S be the set of positive integers for which there is no associated prime curiosity. If S is empty, then we are done. So suppose, for proof by contradiction, that S is not empty. By the well-ordering principle S has a least element, call it *n*. Then *n* is the least positive integer for which there is no associated prime curio. But our last statement is a prime curio for *n*, a contradiction showing S does not have a least element and completing the proof.

Well, I don’t know about you, my dear reader, but I found this proof very exiting. It actually means we could think of a prime curiosity for every positive integer, if only we thought hard enough and long enough. Very beautiful result, indeed!

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Great stuff ! Thanks for posting it.

Please follow the link below for fact about primes

http://kadiprimality.blogspot.com/

Hello webmaster

I would like to share with you a link to your site

write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

Not really. This “theorem” is a joke proof and should not be taken seriously; the joke is that “curiosity” (in other variants, “interesting”) is never defined, and trying to define it precisely you run into all sorts of problems.

I have created articles about prime numbers in the following links:

http://math4allages.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/prime-series-1/

http://math4allages.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/prime-series-2/

you may want to check it out.

I think the author should read the book “The magic of prime number”..

I WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE CURIOSITIC FACT ON NUMBERS

i want some details about curious numbers please give me some information about that

Raksti privāti – izstāstīšu …